WARNING: This is an Archive - Try the New TestMy.net
Home
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

 
  spcr
» Home » Trogers? anyone? help with cablenut again please?!
    
  Home    Help    Search    Login    Register  
 
News : angel Do you think your good enough to write news for testmy.net?  Shoot me a PM and you may be accepted to write for us, a title of nobility angry May 22, 2012, 04:31:05 AM
old.testmy.net forums  |  Main Forum  |  Make it Faster...  |  Topic: Trogers? anyone? help with cablenut again please?! Advanced search
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages 1 Go Down
Author
Topic: Trogers? anyone? help with cablenut again please?!  (Read 1565 times)
wrc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


View Profile
« on: February 27, 2006, 11:46:55 AM »

I've had to do this all again after a hard drive failure.
Done the speed tests, ran cablenut, tcp optimizer results below.
But in cablenut, my RWIN already IS 64240
connection still slow, whats going on?

SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer


TCP properties for IP = ........................ ()
Browser/OS = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address.

TCP options string = 020405b401010402
 
MTU = 1500
MTU is fully optimized for broadband.
 
MSS = 1460
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.
 
Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 17520
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 17520

RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of Cool
256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
 64240 (MSS x 44)
 
bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

Your TCP Window limits you to: 700.8 Kbps (87.6 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your TCP Window limits you to: 280.32 Kbps (35.04 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband.
 
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
 
Time to live left = 118 hops
TTL value is ok.
 
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0)
 
Logged
 
FallowEarth
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2825



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2006, 12:04:09 PM »

Your RWIN says 17520.  What are your advertised speeds again?
Logged
 
wrc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2006, 12:08:08 PM »

I know, its weird, even when i clear the boxes and select "retrieve registry values" it still says 64240

Tiscali 1mb
Logged
 
VanBuren
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6111


Cablenut Tweaker


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2006, 12:26:37 PM »

open cablenut, set

DefaultReceiveWindow to 64240
DefaultSendWindow 17520
GlobalMaxTcpWindowsize 64240
TcpWindowSize 64240

now click save to registry and reboot your PC

make a new speed test and TCP analyzer test

VanBuren Smile
Logged

 
wrc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2006, 12:59:19 PM »

Ok, that worked, although i had tried it earlier.
speed tests still poor tho
Logged
 
wrc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2006, 01:01:06 PM »


SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer


TCP properties for IP = ...................... ()
Browser/OS = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address.

TCP options string = 020405b401010402
 
MTU = 1500
MTU is fully optimized for broadband.
 
MSS = 1460
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.
 
Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 64240
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 64240

RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of Cool
256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
 64240 (MSS x 44) <-- current value
 
bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

Your TCP Window limits you to: 2569.6 Kbps (321.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your TCP Window limits you to: 1027.84 Kbps (128.48 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
 
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
 
Time to live left = 54 hops
TTL value is ok.
 
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0)
 
 
Logged
 
trogers
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 627


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2006, 07:41:57 PM »

Hi wrc,

I forgot what your advertised speed is. Please do a speedtest and post.

Also check to ensure your signal cables and devices are plugged firmly and not placed near to other electrical devices - keep modem and router a few feet apart.
Logged
 
wrc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2006, 11:46:47 AM »

normal download speeds are 50 to 65, when 120 was the norm before. I have checked all cables etc, but nothing has changed, other than a new drive

i'm on tiscali 1mb

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Connection is:: 670 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Download Speed is:: 82 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net  (server1)
Test Time:: Tue Feb 28 18:43:39 UTC 2006
Bottom Line:: 12X faster than 56K 1MB download in 12.49 sec
Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 68.09 % of your hosts average (as9105.com)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-B814JO0AE
Logged
 
VanBuren
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6111


Cablenut Tweaker


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2006, 12:50:42 PM »

what speed do you get here?

http://www.testmy.net/d_load.php?ni=1&st=st&tt=1&ta=1&top=mirror-VanBuren&out_src=5MB

VanBuren Smile
Logged

 
wrc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 01, 2006, 10:50:21 AM »

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Connection is:: 851 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 5248 kB)
Download Speed is:: 104 kB/s
Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net
Test Time:: 
Bottom Line:: 15X faster than 56K 1MB download in 9.85 sec
Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 80.21 % of your hosts average (as9105.com)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-DHA9IZYBJ

This is better, but i cant get these speeds when downloading regular stuff,mp3's, files etc
Logged
 
FallowEarth
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2825



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 02, 2006, 01:31:34 AM »

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Connection is:: 851 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 5248 kB)
Download Speed is:: 104 kB/s
Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net
Test Time:: 
Bottom Line:: 15X faster than 56K 1MB download in 9.85 sec
Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 80.21 % of your hosts average (as9105.com)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-DHA9IZYBJ

This is better, but i cant get these speeds when downloading regular stuff,mp3's, files etc

This is true for anyone.  P2P file sharing depends on a zillion factors.  I have rarely noticed download speeds anywhere near my cap with torrents, etc. even when there are a lot of seeds.  Usually it sits at about 5% of my cap, on average.  Just because you don't see maximum speed in downloads of this nature, doesn't mean that there is anything wrong on your end.  P2P networking is unreliable and always will be.
Logged
 
wrc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 02, 2006, 05:58:32 AM »

?
who said i was downloading with peer to peer?

back to you trogers  Very Happy
Logged
 
FallowEarth
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2825



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2006, 10:48:15 AM »

Try this test: http://www.testmy.net/forum/t-12193
Logged
 
Print  Pages 1 Go Up
old.testmy.net forums  |  Main Forum  |  Make it Faster...  |  Topic: Trogers? anyone? help with cablenut again please?! « previous next »
Jump to:  

    


 

 

 

© 2007 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - This is an older version: Try Bandwidth Speed Test v12