WARNING: This is an Archive -
Try the New TestMy.net
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Home
Download Test
Test Your Download Speed
Test Both Download AND Upload
Upload Test
Test Your Upload Speed
Test Both Upload AND Download
Community
Forum Home
Help
Search
Calendar
Guides
ISP Discussion
» Log-In
» Register
Database Stats
Host Stats
Member Stats
Share Score
Misc Tools
Conversion Calc.
Speed Chart
Conversion Table
Create a Test
Share Score
Automatic Test
Forum Archive
Score Database
trace/ping/whois/DNS
Tweak Guide
!! Search !!
News
News Home
Join
»
Home
»
Directx Hardware version???
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
News
: Have you seen the guides section? It's an always growing section with tons of cool guides for subjects you might not even know about, check it out... it's a good read
May 22, 2012, 06:05:48 AM
old.testmy.net forums
|
Main Forum
|
HELP!
|
HELP! With Other Stuff
| Topic:
Directx Hardware version???
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Topic Tools
Search this topic
Pages
1
2
All
Author
Topic: Directx Hardware version??? (Read 4402 times)
PeePs
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 593
Directx Hardware version???
«
on:
December 31, 2004, 10:54:07 PM »
Ok, so I just got this new video card so I could run HL 2 at decent speeds. My other Power supply was too weak (250 watts) so we got a new one installed along with the new video card. Before anything else I installed the latest drivers from the Nvidia website, and Directx 9.0c. When i fired up HL 2 and did the video stress test i was VERY disappointed with my scores. On the lowest possible settings i got a whopping 60 FPS. In the video settings at the bottom it has:
Software DirectX Version: 9.0
Hardware DirectX Version: 8.1
I was wondering if its possible to make the hardware directx 9, or if it's something built into the card.
Oh yeah:
video card : GeForce 5700 LE 256 MB.
processor : 2800 XP
memory : 512 MB
blajh blah;aklaw
Logged
VISIT MY SITE!
RTB
Dead but Alive
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1932
I'm so evil, I'm hiding half my face from you.
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #1 on:
January 01, 2005, 03:36:28 AM »
Nope, not possible. Btw, there isn't much graphical difference between 9.0 and 8.1, but 8.1 is faster because of the lower requirements.
You should be happy with 60 fps. I doubt I'd get more than 10 with this rig. I have no idea what's wrong with it.
Logged
Quote from: Scud
The other day, in the park, I was wondering why frisbees look bigger and bigger as they get closer to you
And then it hit me
Click me. Or be diminished; one by one.
.s1
Vice Admin
TMN Sr. Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3471
Keep up :police:
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #2 on:
January 01, 2005, 06:38:16 AM »
Yea, you cant change hardware settings, but you should be able to run it pretty well. As for me, on this rig i cant even play 1D tetris so i dont even try anymore.
Logged
Signature:
*~ Member Since: September 20, 2004 ~*
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 4.62Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 20.62Mb/s
PeePs
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 593
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #3 on:
January 01, 2005, 02:45:02 PM »
BAH! I want 200 FPS dammit. haha
Logged
VISIT MY SITE!
.s1
Vice Admin
TMN Sr. Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3471
Keep up :police:
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #4 on:
January 01, 2005, 08:58:14 PM »
The human eye can only read *in reality * 67.7 fps. But if it makes you feel better you can always type developer 1 , fps_max 5500 in console ;)
Logged
Signature:
*~ Member Since: September 20, 2004 ~*
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 4.62Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 20.62Mb/s
Microwave
Inactive Moderator
TMN Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1808
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #5 on:
January 01, 2005, 10:52:00 PM »
Quote from: .s1 on January 01, 2005, 08:58:14 PM
The human eye can only read *in reality * 67.7 fps. But if it makes you feel better you can always type developer 1 , fps_max 5500 in console ;)
No S#!tz s1 where did you pick up that fact, hmmm very interesting
Microwave
Logged
.s1
Vice Admin
TMN Sr. Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3471
Keep up :police:
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #6 on:
January 02, 2005, 12:14:18 AM »
lol a long while ago there was a report when the online gaming scene got bigger, and thats why they urge you to enable vsync , which limits your fps to 60. This "Helps minimise eye strain". as they say :-p
Logged
Signature:
*~ Member Since: September 20, 2004 ~*
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 4.62Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 20.62Mb/s
RTB
Dead but Alive
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1932
I'm so evil, I'm hiding half my face from you.
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #7 on:
January 02, 2005, 11:31:48 AM »
Quote from: .s1 on January 01, 2005, 08:58:14 PM
The human eye can only read *in reality * 67.7 fps.
The human eye can handle up to 200 fps, possibly more. Don't underestimate our body...
I lost the link to the article tho.
Logged
Quote from: Scud
The other day, in the park, I was wondering why frisbees look bigger and bigger as they get closer to you
And then it hit me
Click me. Or be diminished; one by one.
CA3LE
testmy.net Patriarch
Administrator
TMN Sr. Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 4646
yep... ima g33k
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #8 on:
January 02, 2005, 01:06:32 PM »
Quote from: RTB on January 02, 2005, 11:31:48 AM
Quote from: .s1 on January 01, 2005, 08:58:14 PM
The human eye can only read *in reality * 67.7 fps.
The human eye can handle up to 200 fps, possibly more. Don't underestimate our body...
I lost the link to the article tho.
http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm
http://amo.net/NT/02-21-01FPS.html
That is true, it has been tested by the military human eye can see well over 200 fps
~~ I thought the same and I listened to other people for a long time till I found the truth myself.
Logged
Microwave
Inactive Moderator
TMN Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1808
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #9 on:
January 02, 2005, 01:19:23 PM »
Aha thanks CA3LE GUY .....know the truth and the truth shall set you free(whatever that means) I thought I had heard or read something but I wasn't sure.......Bamm thats what makes this stuff so cool...
fiction or fact from the Internet almanac lol
Microwave©
Logged
VanBuren
TMN Seasoned Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6111
Cablenut Tweaker
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #10 on:
January 02, 2005, 01:29:47 PM »
I think high FPS is overrated, with old game engines high fps gave a good adventage cos you could see your opponent faster and so on. I dont think its like that with new games.
Most videocards have a minimal refresh rate of 60 Hz and if you get 60fps+ your fine
the problems accure when fps is lower then the display refresh in Hz
UT2004 for example has by default DisplayRefresh set to 60, so if you know your average fps is above 100 then increase Display Refresh to 100 Hz, that give a smoother game, but i daubt you have very big adventage.
VanBuren
Logged
3dmark06
PCmark05
My CPU
RTB
Dead but Alive
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1932
I'm so evil, I'm hiding half my face from you.
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #11 on:
January 02, 2005, 11:34:22 PM »
Yeah, I noticed that in Halo 1 high FPS wasn't required to win. I could play along just fine on 10 fps. Later I found out that I had maxed out my AA & AF settings, and forgot to set them back.
For games like quake3 you really want a smooth framerate, otherwise your pace slows down, and you die more often. Also the physics are better at about 125 fps. Strange but true.
Logged
Quote from: Scud
The other day, in the park, I was wondering why frisbees look bigger and bigger as they get closer to you
And then it hit me
Click me. Or be diminished; one by one.
.s1
Vice Admin
TMN Sr. Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3471
Keep up :police:
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #12 on:
January 03, 2005, 09:45:16 AM »
fps and computer speed in counterstrike, is a must . I am no novice at counterstrike, yet i get easily killed by newbies who are still trying to figure out how to drop their weapons because of my slow comp speed.
Logged
Signature:
*~ Member Since: September 20, 2004 ~*
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 4.62Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 20.62Mb/s
VanBuren
TMN Seasoned Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6111
Cablenut Tweaker
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #13 on:
January 03, 2005, 10:26:57 AM »
i used to play one of the first multiplayer FPS game made, its Outlaws, a wildwest shooter, that game was all fps and have a laggy connection
I had 1000 fps top and a average of around 600 while playing, that game was actually running faster with that amount of fps and i could see ppl alot faster then they could see me if they played with vsync on and 60 fps hehe
luckely new games, is more fair, antilag coding and no big adventage in high fps
VanBuren
Logged
3dmark06
PCmark05
My CPU
RTB
Dead but Alive
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1932
I'm so evil, I'm hiding half my face from you.
Re: Directx Hardware version???
«
Reply #14 on:
January 03, 2005, 10:38:38 AM »
Quote from: .s1 on January 03, 2005, 09:45:16 AM
fps and computer speed in counterstrike, is a must . I am no novice at counterstrike, yet i get easily killed by newbies who are still trying to figure out how to drop their weapons because of my slow comp speed.
I went from a P3 1GHz to this system, and I've been owning better than ever. Fun thing is, I was a killer a few years ago in Q3, then lost the CD, when I got it back I was a überkiller soon again. It seems I'm a natural born killer.
You should see me at a rockets only (RA3) match... nobody's safe. Record so far is 154 frags and 31 deaths in one session. Last week I started with 24 frags and no deaths, and it was 41-2 in a short while. Some people need to practice more.
Fresh meat:
boredom.jpg
(162.2 KB, 800x600 - viewed 220 times.)
«
Last Edit: January 03, 2005, 11:28:58 AM by RTB
»
Logged
Quote from: Scud
The other day, in the park, I was wondering why frisbees look bigger and bigger as they get closer to you
And then it hit me
Click me. Or be diminished; one by one.
Pages
1
2
All
old.testmy.net forums
|
Main Forum
|
HELP!
|
HELP! With Other Stuff
| Topic:
Directx Hardware version???
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Main Forum
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> PC Security
===> Antivirus & Firewalls
===> Spyware & Malware
===> Viruses & Scams
===> Security Threats
=> Show off your scores!
=> Make it Faster...
=> HELP!
===> HELP! With Other Stuff
===> HELP! With Tests
===> HELP! With Forum
===> Programming and Website Help
=====> HTML
=====> PHP
=====> PERL
=====> Server Help
===> Networking and Hardware
===> Overclocking
===> Linux Help
=> News
===> testmy.net News and Updates
=> Online Gaming Discussion
===> Requests
===> America's Army
===> Battlefield
===> Counter-Strike 1.6
===> Counter-Strike : Source
===> Day of Defeat : Source
===> Diablo
===> F.E.A.R
===> Ghost Recon
===> Halo 2
===> Lineage 2
===> Quake
===> Rainbow Six 3
===> World of Warcraft
===> Tribes 2
===> Unreal Tournament
=> Graphics, Sigs and Pictures
===> Test Board
=> Guides
=> Got any ideas to make testmy.net better?
=> Off Topic Discussion
-----------------------------
Provider Discussion and Reviews
-----------------------------
=> Add a Provider
=> All Dial-up
=> North American Providers (Including Canada)
===> Canadian Providers
=====> teksavvy.com Canada
=====> xplornet.com Canada
=====> Persona Internet
=====> Rogers Communications
=====> Shaw Communications
=====> Sympatico (Bell Canada)
===> Adelphia Communications
===> ALLTEL Communications
===> AOL
===> AT&T WorldNet
=====> SBC (merged with AT&T) [old posts]
===> BellSouth
===> Cable One
===> Cavalier Telephone cavtel.net
===> cebridge.net
===> CenturyTel
===> Charter Communications
===> Comcast Cable Communications
===> Country Cablevision
===> Covad communications
===> Cox Communications
===> DMAX Puerto Rico
===> HughesNet (DIRECWAY)
=====> DW4000 Information
=====> DW6000 Information
=====> DW7000 Information
===> EarthLink
===> Insight Broadband
===> Mediacom Communications
===> mycingular.net
===> Namesco/NDO (ndo.com)
===> onelinkpr.net Puerto Rico
===> Optimum Online
===> Qwest Communications
===> RCN
===> RoadRunner (Time Warner Cable)
===> seidata.com
===> sigecom.net
===> Speakeasy
===> Sprint Nextel Corporation
===> Starband
===> SureWest Communications
=====> SureWest Communications FIOS
===> SusCom - Susquehanna Communications
===> TDS - Telephone and Data Systems, Inc
===> Transedge.com
===> Verizon Online
===> Verizon Online FIOS
===> Wave Broadband
===> Wide Open West
===> Wildblue Communications, Inc
=> World Providers (Non-North American)
===> African Providers
===> Asian and Middle Eastern Providers
=====> Asian Providers
=====> Sify Broadband
=====> Streamyx
=====> Smart Bro (Wi-fi)
===> Australian Providers
=====> Digiplus
=====> Optusnet
=====> Telstra Bigpond
===> UK and European Providers
=====> Bredbandsbolaget
=======> Bredbandsbolaget Fiber
=======> Bredbandsbolaget ADSL, VDSL
=====> Virgin.net (old NTL)
=====> Tiscali
===> Central/South American Providers
-----------------------------
Miscellaneous
-----------------------------
=> Archives
===> Announcements
=> Public Polls
===> Not on index
Print
Advanced search
Page created in 0.13 seconds with 20 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13
|
SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
Loading...
© 2007 testmy.net -
Contact
-
Legal
- This is an older version:
Try Bandwidth Speed Test v12