WARNING: This is an Archive - Try the New TestMy.net
Home
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

 
  spcr
» Home » Digital Camera
    
  Home    Help    Search    Login    Register  
 
News : Before you post... try a Why don't you search? - Many simple questions have already been answered.  If your query turns up dry then post, we always have people waiting for your questions. azn May 22, 2012, 05:11:59 PM
old.testmy.net forums  |  Main Forum  |  HELP!  |  Networking and Hardware  |  Topic: Digital Camera Advanced search
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages 1 Go Down
Author
Topic: Digital Camera  (Read 2691 times)
OrGaN_ShIfTeR
Global Moderator
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1314


Let's Not and Say We Did.


View Profile WWW
« on: January 01, 2005, 04:19:54 PM »

For the past week I've been reading several reviews on digital cameras/webcams (PC-Cams) in hopes of getting a good one. At first, I narrowed my choices down to a couple of selections.

Which were:

1.) Logitech ClickSmart 820


Main Features
Resolution 2.0 Megapixel
Webcam Capability Yes
Colour Support Colour
Optical Sensor Type CCD
Total Pixels 2,100,000 pixels
Effective Sensor Resolution 1,920,000 pixels
Digital Zoom 2 x
Shooting Modes Frame movie mode
Exposure Modes Automatic
White Balance Automatic
Digital Video Format AVI
Still Image Format JPEG
Video Capture 10 fps - 60 sec - AVI - 320 x 240 - with 8MB built-in memory
- 320 x 240 - web camera mode
- 640 x 480 - web camera mode

2.) Creative PC-CAM 880


Main Features
Resolution 2.0 Megapixel / 3.0 Megapixel (interpolated)
Webcam Capability Yes
Colour Support Colour
Optical Sensor Type CMOS
Total Pixels 2,000,000 pixels
Interpolated Image Resolution 3,145,728 pixels
Digital Zoom 4 x
Shooting Modes Frame movie mode
Exposure Modes Automatic
White Balance Automatic
Digital Video Format AVI
Still Image Format JPEG
Video Capture 8 fps - 76 sec - AVI - 640 x 480 - with 16MB built-in memory
15 fps - 98 sec - 320 x 240 - with 16MB built-in memory
10 fps - 640 x 480 - web camera mode

Although both cameras are very close in comparison, the difference that matters most to me is the sensor type. As you can see, the "Logitech ClickSmart 820" has a CCD Sensor (Charged-Coupled Device) while the "Creative PC-CAM 880" has a CMOS Sensor (Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor). Being that CCD sensors produce far better image quality than CMOS sensors, I decided to go with the "Logitech ClickSmart 820" due to the fact that it received better reviews than the "Creative PC-CAM 880" (which received several bad reviews).

I had my mind made up until I came across this marvelous device.

Trust 910Z PowerC@m Optical Zoom Home Page Specs


Main Features
Resolution 3.1 Megapixel / 5 Megapixel (interpolated)
Webcam Capability Yes
Colour Support Colour
Optical Sensor Type CCD
Effective Sensor Resolution 3,014,656 pixels
Light Sensitivity ISO 100, ISO 200
Digital Zoom 4 x
Shooting Modes Landscape, portrait mode, macro, night scene
Exposure Modes Programme, automatic
White Balance Automatic, presets
White Balance Presets Incandescent, fluorescent, daylight, shade
Still Image Format JPEG

So, in closing, I've decided to go with the "Trust 910Z PowerC@m Optical Zoom".

I have a problem though. I can't seem to find a vendor that has a US shipping option. Does anyone know if this camera is available in the US, and if not, is there an available english version?

And how much is the listed price in US money? Look Here

I added a .pdf document for those interested in CCD vs CMOS.

* Photonics_Spectra_CCDvsCMOS_Litwiller.pdf (385.41 KB - downloaded 39 times.)
« Last Edit: January 01, 2005, 06:18:53 PM by organ_shifter » Logged

 
Microwave
Inactive Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1808


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 01, 2005, 06:36:22 PM »

 Smile In dollars its about $266.00 plus a 19% VAT, what megapixel size do you require, thats what determines the price,  Also I guess if you want and need many features that will also drive up price..
Cool Microwave
« Last Edit: January 01, 2005, 06:39:47 PM by MICROWAVE » Logged


 
resopalrabotnick
News Anchor
TMN Sr. Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4290


Troll by nature


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2005, 10:06:17 PM »

well, if you're looking in the 250 300 us$ range, take a look at the kodak dx 7440. picked that bad boy up a month ago and am happy with it. 4 MP, but with a 4x optical zoom. disregard digital zoom, since that's just the incredible inflatable pixel. ;)

depending on how serious you want to e snapping pix, this one is nice because you get decent pictures in the auto mode, and you can fiddle with the widgets to your hearts content on manual.

and what's all the bad vibes about trolls? they are some of my favorite SR chars...
Logged

" border="0

click me! me too!
Give a man a fire and he is warm for a night, but set fire to him and he is warm for the rest of his life.

sig done by S7R1D3R
 
OrGaN_ShIfTeR
Global Moderator
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1314


Let's Not and Say We Did.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2005, 08:15:40 AM »

well, if you're looking in the 250 300 us$ range, take a look at the kodak dx 7440. picked that bad boy up a month ago and am happy with it. 4 MP, but with a 4x optical zoom. disregard digital zoom, since that's just the incredible inflatable pixel. ;)

Yeah, the specs for that camera are pretty damn nice. I just didn't see a wabcam feature. I really want to get a high quality digital camera (with a CCD lens) that supports webcam capabilities as well.
Logged

 
resopalrabotnick
News Anchor
TMN Sr. Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4290


Troll by nature


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2005, 08:40:58 AM »

ah, color me stupid. missed the webcam part.

hm. buy decent digicam, then standalone webcam? sounds to me like the combos give too much away on the digicam end, in favor of the webcam option...

and the video function is really nice. on the 512sd card i popped in i can take 48 minutes of 320*240 at good framerate.
Logged

" border="0

click me! me too!
Give a man a fire and he is warm for a night, but set fire to him and he is warm for the rest of his life.

sig done by S7R1D3R
 
Microwave
Inactive Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1808


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2005, 11:16:28 AM »

 Smile  I'm sure they have them but I have never seen a camera that was a good high quality digital that took good pics and also  was a good web cam, again they must be out there so if anyone has one let us know, I'm also interested. My brother got a Fuji a while back so it was up 2me to figure out how it worked and to load pics on his puter and then show him and his daughter how it worked, but it was a nice digital cam but no web Sad
Cool Microwave©
« Last Edit: January 04, 2005, 04:48:18 PM by MICROWAVE » Logged


 
resopalrabotnick
News Anchor
TMN Sr. Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4290


Troll by nature


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2005, 04:41:43 PM »

well, yo piqued my interest on the subject, so i did a quick google, and it seems that quite a few of the fuji (www.fujifilm.com) have the webcam feature. they also seem like nice digicams. what is probably a big minus is the fact that they are rather pricey.

i stand by my previous verdict. forget about compromises. you never get what you really need. buy decent cam and decent webcam, probably save money in the process, and you can pick both for it's specialized features.

but then, i could be wrong. Smile
Logged

" border="0

click me! me too!
Give a man a fire and he is warm for a night, but set fire to him and he is warm for the rest of his life.

sig done by S7R1D3R
 
OrGaN_ShIfTeR
Global Moderator
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1314


Let's Not and Say We Did.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2005, 07:43:55 PM »

A couple of years back I had a PC-CAM 750. It took great digital pics and was the best webcam I'd ever used. Both of those features worked very well because of the CCD optical sensor.

When Creative launched the more recent PC-CAM 850, 880, 900, and 920, they seemed to have taken a step down in the image processing & clarity catagory, largely due to the fact that they were designed around a CMOS sensor. From a digital camera standpoint, the images turn out very distorted at high resolutions. As a webcam, there is far too mush noise in the display (common in CMOS sensors), which, in turn, makes it an unpleasant experience for you as well as others (not to mention the lack of a low light compensation feature).

Now, Logitech's ClickSmart 820 offers us the best of both worlds-incorporating a high quality CCD optical sensor that delivers fantastic results as a digital camera/webcam. The specs for the ClickSmart 820 are pretty impressive, and it beats out the PC-CAM 750 (which I enjoyed alot). The ClickSmart 820 truely is a great dual cam.

After careful review of the Trust 910Z PowerC@m Optical Zoom, it's plain to see that this device is top shelf. It has everything you could ask for out of a dual camera and more. A true, 3.1 megapixel (2048 x 1472) CCD optical sensor offers more than enough resolution to please any consumer who's looking to take digital pictures with great clarity. It really seems to be a digital camera first, but still makes those who enjoy caming feel comfortable in knowing that there is a high quality CCD optical sensor delivering colors that are rich & vibrant. I still put my money on this one for dual cams. Very Happy

If someone has any info on this cam being multi-language, please let me know.
When I decide to purchase it, I'll have to send one of you the money for the camera as well as all other shipping & handling cost. (providing that it's in english).
« Last Edit: January 04, 2005, 07:51:16 PM by organ_shifter » Logged

 
Print  Pages 1 Go Up
old.testmy.net forums  |  Main Forum  |  HELP!  |  Networking and Hardware  |  Topic: Digital Camera « previous next »
Jump to:  

    


 

 

 

© 2007 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - This is an older version: Try Bandwidth Speed Test v12