Hey there wmmc;
Would you believe that Wild Blue is going to be built (in fact it already is) upon the very same framework as DirecWay ...right down to using (mostly) the very same Satellites, AND a FAP policy (which they refuse to be "exact" about when asked to describe). Also, they are having Hughes build the new satellite (named Horizon if memory serves) that will be the backbone of their "new" system.
WildBlue has been around for quite awhile operating on low-band (Ka) frequencies, yet this new satellite is going to carry the ability for "full band" transmissions/receptions ...there are just several legal changes being made to benefit DirecWay with an eye to FCC Regs and the fact that DirecWay's license to operate is not legal by FCC laws. DirecWay and Wild Blue will BOTH be sharing bandwidth off that same satellite ...so in a nutshell Wild Blue is just another "shuck and jive" that DirecWay is pulling (like when they changed their names from DirecPC to DirecWay when they lost the lawsuit), to 'fake out' the public into buying into yet another nightmare. The only difference is that DirecWay will remain in business and will operate under the Wild Blue communications license (because DirecWay's license to operate by FCC standards is illegal). Wild Blue is just a legal maneveur to make DirecWay "legal" according to US (FCC) bylaws. Period! Same architecture, different face. Crooked tactics. Typical big business!
* I've presented this evidence before yet received many "NO, you are wrong" responses based upon the fact that Wild Blue is going to use the Ka Bands instead of the frequencies now in effect. (And I mean the people that wanted to argue over it were UGLY about it ..as if I were calling their best friends or parents liars)! Freaky! I don't care if Wild Blue does or does not offer Internet Service. I am just supplying facts that can easily be proven using nothing more than Google and a bit of reading! lol...
It doesn't matter what "band" is being used for Internet Communication. The fact is that Hughes (DirecWay) is funding almost every aspect of Wild Blue (suddenly), right down to building a brand new billion-dollar satellite in return for usage rights), another "bird" designed for DirecTV and Internet is rather obvious in the realm of evidence to me. Doesn't take a Rocket Scientist to figure out the rest of the puzzle, or at least I'm firmly convinced that I am "on the money." Time will tell for sure. Personally, I wouldn't TOUCH Wild Blue for several, several months. I don't believe I need to state why do I?

However, I surely do wish they had NO affiliations with Hughes ...THEN I would have reason to get my hopes up. But alas, there are no reasons for any such thing. WildBlue = Hughes in my book (at the moment anyway).
If anything, I am hoping that I am 100% wrong ...but geesh, considering the evidence paints a grim picture!
Cheers!