WARNING: This is an Archive - Try the New TestMy.net
Home
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

 
  spcr
» Home » 100 MB Download Test. Let's Compair.
    
  Home    Help    Search    Login    Register  
 
News : Have an idea that will make testmy.net better?  Click here to post it!  We love to hear feedback, user feedback like yours have helped build testmy.net over the years.. true story wink May 25, 2012, 10:40:47 PM
old.testmy.net forums  |  Main Forum  |  Show off your scores!  |  Topic: 100 MB Download Test. Let's Compair. Advanced search
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Go Down
Author
Topic: 100 MB Download Test. Let's Compair.  (Read 25807 times)
ghostmaster
Sophist Member
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 861


Wallowing in my own obscenity...


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: October 02, 2006, 08:58:00 AM »

Nope, did it at work....
Logged

Suddenlink Premium | 10Mb\768Kb plan.
  You call these bagels???
 
VanBuren
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6111


Cablenut Tweaker


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: October 02, 2006, 09:28:43 AM »

a bit faster today  Very Happy

dont think it will go much faster then this on this route

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2     3 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  ua-85-226-177-2.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.226
.177.2]
  3     4 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  vlan2.dr2.lul10.se.bredband.com [195.54.119.238]

  4     1 ms    <1 ms     1 ms  port-channel3.dr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.1
19.233]
  5     8 ms     1 ms     1 ms  ge1-0.cr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.115.225]

  6    24 ms    20 ms    20 ms  pos4-0.cr2.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.124.26]

  7    23 ms    21 ms    20 ms  pos5-0.cr1.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.97]

  8    21 ms    20 ms    20 ms  pos6-0-0.cr2.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.18
1]
  9   144 ms    38 ms   176 ms  pos13-0.cr1.sto2.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.122
]
 10    21 ms    20 ms    20 ms  pos1-0.br1.sto2.se.bredband.com [195.54.117.14]

 11    21 ms    21 ms    21 ms  s-b3-pos6-1.telia.net [213.248.101.49]
 12    21 ms    22 ms    21 ms  s-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.249.89]
 13    32 ms    32 ms    32 ms  kbn-bb1-link.telia.net [213.248.65.142]
 14   137 ms   151 ms   151 ms  nyk-bb1-pos0-1-0.telia.net [213.248.64.22]
 15   153 ms   134 ms   151 ms  chi-bb1-pos6-0-0-0.telia.net [213.248.80.153]
 16   152 ms   151 ms   151 ms  so0-2-0-250.j2.ord.scnet.net [64.202.110.69]
 17   153 ms   151 ms   151 ms  unknown.scnet.net [216.246.50.2]
 18   155 ms   151 ms   152 ms  cachefly.equinix.chicago1.cachepop.net [66.225.2
40.37]

Trace complete.

VanBuren Smile
Logged

 
dlewis23
Global Moderator
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8165

HEY! ill put it down when im good and ready.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #32 on: October 02, 2006, 02:25:26 PM »

dont know why but i get pertty bad speeds from this.
Logged

 
Blunted 2
Sophist Member
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2466

Fios 20/20


View Profile WWW
« Reply #33 on: October 02, 2006, 07:52:21 PM »

this host is very slow if you ask me cause my ping and route is great but i get horrible speeds.

C:\Documents and Settings\Eebobb>tracert cachefly.com

Tracing route to cachefly.com [66.225.240.37]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     5 ms     5 ms     5 ms  10.50.192.1
  2     8 ms     7 ms     7 ms  dstswr1-vlan2.rh.lybrny.cv.net [167.206.33.33]
  3     7 ms     6 ms     5 ms  r3-ge9-2.mhe.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.33.1]
  4     8 ms     5 ms     5 ms  r1-srp0-0.wan.hcvlny.cv.net [65.19.104.193]
  5     7 ms     7 ms     7 ms  r2-srp5-0.in.nycmnyzr.cv.net [65.19.96.56]
  6    33 ms    33 ms    33 ms  65.19.102.134
  7    28 ms    29 ms    28 ms  ge0-0-1.j2.ord.scnet.net [206.223.119.57]
  8    31 ms    29 ms    44 ms  ae1-4000m.c2.ord.scnet.net [64.202.110.66]
  9    34 ms    35 ms    35 ms  ae2-4000m.c1.ord.scnet.net [205.234.205.217]
 10    28 ms    30 ms    29 ms  cachefly.equinix.chicago1.cachepop.net [66.225.2
40.37]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Eebobb>ping cachefly.com -t

Pinging cachefly.com [66.225.240.37] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 66.225.240.37:
    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 33ms, Average = 29ms
Control-C
^C
C:\Documents and Settings\Eebobb>

all of this is BS if you ask me cause they are really slow compared to testmy.net  and claim to be faster than this host which they are not cause i am proof and have tests to prove it.

The networks chosen all have multi-gigabit connectivity, a great reputation and strong SLA's. But how do they stack up on latency, the bottleneck in real-world tcp performance?


The provider with the lowest latency is highlighted for each city on Level3's Network
City    CacheFly    RackSpace    HostWay    The Planet    Interland
Atlanta, GA    12ms    32ms    20ms    20ms    28ms
Baltimore, MD    1ms    52ms    20ms    36ms    20ms
Boston, MA    8ms    56ms    20ms    40ms    24ms
Chicago, IL    1ms    36ms    12ms    36ms    28ms
Cincinnati, OH    4ms    36ms    12ms    40ms    36ms
Cleveland, OH    8ms    44ms    16ms    40ms    20ms
Charlotte, NC    16ms    36ms    24ms    24ms    32ms
Dallas, TX    32ms    4ms    36ms    1ms    32ms
Denver, CO    24ms    20ms    24ms    16ms    44ms
Detroit, MI    4ms    40ms    4ms    44ms    36ms
FIX-West NAP San Jose    1ms    60ms    56ms    44ms    76ms
Garden City, NY    8ms    56ms    20ms    36ms    16ms
Houston, TX    36ms    12ms    40ms    20ms    40ms
Los Angeles, CA    12ms    48ms    68ms    32ms    68ms
Las Vegas, NV    16ms    52ms    44ms    32ms    78ms
Miami, FL    28ms    44ms    32ms    32ms    40ms
Newark, NJ    4ms    52ms    20ms    36ms    20ms
New York, NY    4ms    52ms    20ms    36ms    20ms
Oakland, CA    1ms    64ms    60ms    44ms    76ms
Orlando, FL    24ms    56ms    28ms    28ms    36ms
Philadelphia, PA    4ms    52ms    24ms    36ms    20ms
Phoenix, AZ    20ms    48ms    60ms    24ms    64ms
Raleigh, NC    4ms    56ms    20ms    36ms    20ms
Richmond, VA    8ms    56ms    20ms    36ms    16ms
Sacramento, CA    4ms    60ms    64ms    44ms    80ms
San Antonio, TX    40ms    16ms    48ms    8ms    40ms
San Diego, CA    12ms    48ms    64ms    28ms    68ms
Seattle, WA    20ms    64ms    48ms    40ms    72ms
San Francisco, CA    1ms    60ms    56ms    44ms    76ms
San Jose, CA    1ms    60ms    64ms    44ms    76ms
Salt Lake City, UT    24ms    52ms    36ms    24ms    56ms
Saint Louis, MO    4ms    32ms    4ms    32ms    32ms
Stamford, CT    4ms    52ms    24ms    36ms    20ms
Tampa, FL    32ms    40ms    36ms    24ms    48ms
Tustin, CA    12ms    48ms    72ms    32ms    68ms
Washington, DC    1ms    52ms    40ms    32ms    16ms
Weehawken, NJ    4ms    52ms    24ms    40ms    20ms
     CacheFly    RackSpace    HostWay    The Planet    Interland
Average Latency    12.19ms    47.22ms    35.55ms    33.25ms    43.33ms


The numbers speak for themselves - CacheFly outperformed the competition:

      • 2.5x faster than The Planet
      • 2.9x faster than HostWay
      • 3.5x faster than Interland
      • 3.9x faster than RackSpace

Logged

 
dlewis23
Global Moderator
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8165

HEY! ill put it down when im good and ready.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #34 on: October 02, 2006, 08:10:34 PM »

Blunted 2 that stuff on there website is complete BS.

I know for a fact rackspace is faster then 44ms to Miami, its more like 12ms.
Logged

 
Blunted 2
Sophist Member
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2466

Fios 20/20


View Profile WWW
« Reply #35 on: October 02, 2006, 08:17:18 PM »

i know man  :haha: :haha:   another thing is i got about 1 MB/s last night and now its only 237 kB/s so yea its really fast alright LOL.  garbage is what it is


Logged

 
VanBuren
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6111


Cablenut Tweaker


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: October 12, 2006, 12:45:04 PM »

VanBuren  Very Happy


* gettin_better.JPG (165.55 KB, 1280x1024 - viewed 161 times.)
Logged

 
just-
Vice Admin
TMN Sr. Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3885


ISP - Be ADSL2+ 11.6Mbps - 1.3Mbps


View Profile WWW
« Reply #37 on: October 12, 2006, 12:47:01 PM »

now that kick ass Van
and glad to see u back

beeb a while
Logged



Download 11.6Mbps
Upload 1.3Mbps

My CPU: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=40752
 
dlewis23
Global Moderator
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8165

HEY! ill put it down when im good and ready.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #38 on: October 12, 2006, 01:49:12 PM »

nice van you got faster then my dedicated server  :haha:
Logged

 
tommie gorman
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8605


"OLD GLORY"


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: October 12, 2006, 07:36:35 PM »

That connection is always so sweet. Nice job Van.  thumbsup
Logged

IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
 
snmp_rape
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


View Profile WWW
« Reply #40 on: October 13, 2006, 01:05:58 AM »

Logged

 
just-
Vice Admin
TMN Sr. Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3885


ISP - Be ADSL2+ 11.6Mbps - 1.3Mbps


View Profile WWW
« Reply #41 on: October 13, 2006, 12:08:56 PM »

 hi snmp_rape
and welcome to the forum
i see u are using some sort of download accelerator

what is ur isp
and what is ur adverstised speed ?
Logged



Download 11.6Mbps
Upload 1.3Mbps

My CPU: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=40752
 
snmp_rape
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


View Profile WWW
« Reply #42 on: October 13, 2006, 02:29:25 PM »

thank you for the welcome.  my isp is charter. and my speed is unlimited.  well at least limited to hardware and overhead.  i was using dap.  my ping to that link was kinda high.  so the only way to get any good speed was to use multi-thread.  while ive got the attention of an admin, everytime i try to use my speed test image on another forum i only get a link.  ive tried all three types of code?  they only support BBcode.  is there away around this?  thanx.
Logged

 
dlewis23
Global Moderator
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8165

HEY! ill put it down when im good and ready.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #43 on: October 13, 2006, 08:30:49 PM »

welcome to the forum snmp_rape

nice speed.
Logged

 
Visionary
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: October 15, 2006, 06:55:10 PM »


From doing the optonline speed test these are my results...
Logged


 
Print  Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Go Up
old.testmy.net forums  |  Main Forum  |  Show off your scores!  |  Topic: 100 MB Download Test. Let's Compair. « previous next »
Jump to:  

    


 

 

 

© 2007 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - This is an older version: Try Bandwidth Speed Test v12