WARNING: This is an Archive - Try the New TestMy.net
Home
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

 
  spcr
» Home » Now I know I can do much better than this.....
    
  Home    Help    Search    Login    Register  
 
News : angel Do you think your good enough to write news for testmy.net?  Shoot me a PM and you may be accepted to write for us, a title of nobility angry May 23, 2012, 03:07:10 PM
old.testmy.net forums  |  Main Forum  |  Make it Faster...  |  Topic: Now I know I can do much better than this..... Advanced search
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages 1 Go Down
Author
Topic: Now I know I can do much better than this.....  (Read 968 times)
The ex cheated on me
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 21



View Profile
« on: June 20, 2007, 08:15:22 AM »

Here are my download stats.....verizon.net

Can anyone help? Van Buren...?


::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 306 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 386 kB)
Download Speed is:: 37 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2007/06/20 - 8:11am
Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 27.68 sec
Tested from a 386 kB file and took 10.335 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : -100 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-FPO70KBV3
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

Logged
 
mudmanc4
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1596


Nothin like almond aged wine lol


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2007, 08:21:45 AM »

 lol, cool name , I've been there  Shocked

 Do a bit of reading http://www.testmy.net/t-3924.60 here, Start from the beginning.

 If you have ANY questions please post them, and we will all do whatever we can.

 There are many things you can do to help your connection speed out, so lets get started  smiley
Logged

Those who take what they hear in the main stream media as fact, need to broaden there mental horizons by miles, listen to all, educate yourself,  and make your own decision! ~ me
 
tommie gorman
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8605


"OLD GLORY"


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2007, 03:10:06 PM »

Man, ain't that a normal story. Anyway, try reading this.
http://www.testmy.net/t-4257
So is that DSL, EVDO, FIOS?
Logged

IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
 
The ex cheated on me
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 21



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2007, 05:02:34 AM »

Thanks everyone. I have gone through the thread and most of what's up there I had already done.
Spybot, Avast, ccleaner, windows updates, SP2, defrag each month etc etc,

I am wondering if it's my router set up?? I had the standard Verizon DSL 1.5Mbps package originally, and then was upgraded to the 3.0Mbps package using a Westell 327W router/modem combo like everyone else. The 327W did not have enough wireless range, so I put it in bridge mode and use it as a modem only now, and have hooked up a Linksys WRT54GX4 with SRX400 as the wireless router.
I know this setup works okay, but am concerned that my speed may be limited to my old 327W Westell acting as the modem.
I have cablenut installed and am using the settings for 'fast adsl 2K' is this correct?

Thanks,
Logged
 
tommie gorman
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8605


"OLD GLORY"


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2007, 02:47:57 PM »

So try it by passing the router altogather. Just directly to the modem and try that to find out if it is the router.  Very Happy Good luck.
Logged

IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
 
Dark06
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 790


----Hey----


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2007, 06:38:35 PM »

IS THAT SPEED TEST WIRED OR WIRELESS?
Logged



I think we risk becoming the best informed society that has ever died of ignorance.  ~Reuben Blades
 
The ex cheated on me
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 21



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 22, 2007, 04:50:17 AM »

That's a direct wired test. I also bypassed the router as suggested - back to the original setup using the 327w, and it's about the same. Also tried at different times of the day. All tests are within 1% of each other...

Logged
 
Dark06
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 790


----Hey----


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 22, 2007, 02:16:28 PM »

Ok please Post New Speed Test

what were advertized speed?
Logged



I think we risk becoming the best informed society that has ever died of ignorance.  ~Reuben Blades
 
mudmanc4
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1596


Nothin like almond aged wine lol


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 22, 2007, 04:01:10 PM »

 Just for shts and ggles, do a test from this NTD server @ Stanford. Post the " details , and the rest of the info , so we can see best what your connection is doing.

http://netspeed.stanford.edu/
Logged

Those who take what they hear in the main stream media as fact, need to broaden there mental horizons by miles, listen to all, educate yourself,  and make your own decision! ~ me
 
The ex cheated on me
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 21



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 23, 2007, 10:00:37 AM »

Thanks all,

Ran the test and here are the 'details' ;

WEB100 Enabled Statistics:
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done
checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done
running 10s outbound test (client-to-server [C2S]) . . . . . 718.0kB/s
running 10s inbound test (server-to-client [S2C]) . . . . . . 185.31kB/s

   ------  Client System Details  ------
OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1
Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0

   ------  Web100 Detailed Analysis  ------
Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found.
Link set to Full Duplex mode
Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.
Good network cable(s) found
Normal duplex operation found.

Web100 reports the Round trip time = 162.32 msec; the Packet size = 1452 Bytes; and
There were 21 packets retransmitted, 54 duplicate acks received, and 61 SACK blocks received
The connection stalled 2 times due to packet loss
The connection was idle 0.82 seconds (7.45%) of the time
C2S throughput test: Packet queuing detected: 9.71%
S2C throughput test: Packet queuing detected: 99.23%
This connection is network limited 99.53% of the time.
Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch

Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:
RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON
RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON
RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF
RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF
RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON

Server 'netspeed.stanford.edu' is probably behind a firewall. [Connection to the ephemeral port failed]
Client is probably behind a firewall. [Connection to the ephemeral port failed]
Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable
Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address
   Server says [71.255.141.37] but Client says [192.168.1.100]
Logged
 
Print  Pages 1 Go Up
old.testmy.net forums  |  Main Forum  |  Make it Faster...  |  Topic: Now I know I can do much better than this..... « previous next »
Jump to:  

    


 

 

 

© 2007 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - This is an older version: Try Bandwidth Speed Test v12